Stablecoin Yields: Real Risks

Stablecoin Yields: Real Risks (and Safer Alternatives)

“Earn 8–20% on your stablecoins!” When you see that promise, pause. Yield is never free—it’s a trade-off between risk, liquidity, and transparency. This plain-English guide explains how stablecoin yields are created, the major risks, and how to reduce blow-up risk while still earning something.

Reading time: 8–10 min • Education only—no financial advice

How “Stablecoin Yields” Are Made

Most stablecoin yields come from one or more of these sources:

  • Cash & T-bill ladders: Tokens are backed by short-term Treasuries. Yield ≈ risk-free rate minus fees.
  • Market making / lending: Platforms lend stablecoins to traders or liquidity pools in return for interest/fees.
  • Incentives / token emissions: Protocols subsidize returns with their own tokens (not sustainable by itself).
  • Leverage or rehypothecation: One dollar gets pledged multiple times to juice APY (hidden fragility).
Diagram: Sources of stablecoin yield: T-bills, lending, AMMs, incentives, leverage
Yield must come from somewhere—know the engine before you deposit.

The 4 Big Risk Buckets

1) Counterparty/Custody Risk

If someone else holds reserves or controls withdrawals, your risk is their risk. Centralized lenders, exchanges, or bridges can freeze, gate, or fail.

2) Smart-Contract & Oracle Risk

Non-custodial doesn’t mean risk-free. Contracts can be exploited; price oracles can be manipulated. Audits help, but do not guarantee safety.

3) Regulatory/Policy Risk

Crackdowns can kill a yield product overnight or force redemptions. Jurisdiction, licensing, disclosures, and reserve attestations matter.

4) Liquidity & Duration Mismatch

If the platform offers “instant liquidity” while it invests in longer-dated assets, a rush for the exit can cause delays, losses, or forced liquidations.

Red Flags to Watch For

  • APYs far above T-bills with vague explanation.
  • No real-time reserve transparency or independent custody.
  • Emissions-only yield (paid in a volatile token) with no real fees.
  • “We’ve never been hacked” in lieu of audits, bug bounties, and circuit breakers.
  • Complex wrappers/bridges with unclear legal claims on reserves.

Related: USDC vs. USDT • Stablecoin Safety Checklist

Peg Risk: When $1 ≠ $1

Even if you “earn yield,” it’s useless if the token can’t exit at $1. Peg breaks stem from opaque reserves, concentrated bank risk, halted redemptions, or onchain liquidity traps.

  • Prefer transparent reserves (T-bills, cash) + frequent attestations.
  • Check primary redemption terms (who can redeem, when, fees).
  • Verify on/off-ramp depth (CEX/DEX liquidity, spread at size).

Safer Setups (Lower, but Realistic)

  • Short-term T-bill exposure via regulated funds (transparent, low duration).
  • Blue-chip non-custodial lending with caps, audits, over-collateralization, and pause controls.
  • Direct Treasury bills via your broker (no smart-contract or platform risk, but off-chain).

Safer ≠ safe. Limit position size, diversify venues, and rehearse exits.

Quick Due-Diligence Checklist

  • Where does yield come from? (fees, lending, T-bills, emissions?)
  • Who holds the reserves? Independent custody? Real-time proof?
  • Smart-contract audits, bug bounty, and kill-switch?
  • Redemption mechanics and limits? Liquidity at size?
  • Jurisdiction, licensing, and historical incident reports?
  • Exit rehearsal: how fast and at what spread can you unwind?

FAQ

Why are some stablecoin yields so high?

Because they include leverage, liquidity risk, or token subsidies. If it’s far above T-bills, risk is embedded somewhere.

Are on-chain yields safer than centralized platforms?

They remove human custody, but introduce smart-contract/oracle risk. Safety depends on the design and operations.

What’s a reasonable baseline?

Short-term T-bill yields (minus fees). Anything materially higher deserves deeper diligence.

Scroll to Top